Capture One Pro Review | Image Editing Software - How much will the iPhone 13 cost, and how much storage does it have?

Looking for:

Capture one pro 12 rumors free -  

Click here to DOWNLOAD

   

 

Capture one pro 12 rumors free -

 

When a guilty person is questioned by the police about an alleged crime they usually deflect and obfuscate with unclear answers. An innocent person, however, will be forthcoming with any and all information. They know that shining a light on the situation will absolve them of the accusation.

While MPW was not accused of any crimes, the repeated inflammatory articles from the Wall Street Journal created a rumor that MPW's largest tenant was on the cusp of bankruptcy. As the loss of rental income would be a significant blow to MPW, its stock has fallen precipitously as these rumors circulated and even picked up steam as other outlets jumped on the bandwagon.

Just as the innocent person provides an alibi, MPW chose to address the situation with a massive increase to transparency. The aforementioned Wall Street Journal series of articles made it sound as if MPW was gifting money to private equity sponsors so as to keep Steward afloat. As you know, I have voiced rebuttal to this notion since those articles surfaced. Quite simply, that just isn't how finance works.

Everything in economics is about pursuing self-interest. It is the very basis of capitalism and it is within a capitalist society that MPW operates. MPW provided loans to Steward and previously its private equity sponsors for one reason and one reason only: To attempt to generate a strong return on those investments. The latest supplemental reveals the terms of the loans to Steward as well as those to other healthcare operators.

With each loan comes some sort of return. It is yet to be determined if this was a good investment, but what I can say with certainty is that MPW made this loan with the intent for it to be a good investment.

All things in the world of investment are risky. Some will play out well and others will not. MPW has a strong track record on similar equity style investments in operators as demonstrated by their high returns on Earnest and others.

My hunch is that this one will work out well also. The other notion that has been firmly dispelled is that these loans were necessary for Steward to be able to pay their rents. Thus, Steward will continue to pay rent because it is in their own economic interest to do so. They have to pay that rent in order to use the facility to generate the revenues.

It is not that MPW was hiding it before, but rather that this new level of transparency goes far beyond what is required and beyond what is seen in peers. The reason tenant by tenant breakdowns are not always available in REIT disclosures is that it is not easy for a REIT to provide this information as tenant financials and loan specifics each involve a counterparty. Thus, for the REIT to disclose the information they have to seek out the permission of each counterparty. It must have been an impressive workload to bring all this disclosure together, but with how clobbered MPW's stock has gotten I think the effort will prove well worth it.

Despite the 2. It is worth noting that the corporate level profitability of Steward in was mostly just lowered by one-time items so I would anticipate it turning profitable at a company level in However, I don't even think that is necessary to secure MPW's revenues.

One of the less-known aspects of REITs is how property level economics can often trump corporate level problems. An exchange on the conference call explained this quite nicely.

Forgive me as the quote is rather long, but there is a lot of meat in there worth digesting. So Steward, 2. Edward K. They are all facility level, revenue numbers without any adjustments made to any of them. John Joseph Pawlowski But if I try to marry that with the -- I think it was a June '21 investor presentation, where Steward's financials coverage was sub-1x.

How do I marry these 2 figures? Aldag Founder Well, yes, I think you're referring to the corporate financial statements that were filed and the adjustments that were made to that.

Is that what you're referring to? Aldag And those adjustments were nonrecurring corporate non-facility level numbers. For example, there was a big adjustment for electronic health records and IT that was incurred up at the top at the parent level.

We didn't try to push that down to the facilities. And just by way of quick background, the reason we look at it from a facility level basis is if something happens, stay at that top parent level. So going back to your question about the financials, all of the financial statements that we filed last June or July, if that were to lead to financial stress at the Steward level, what we want to be sure of when we underwrite and when we collect our rent, is that if that happens and it impacts Steward operations, we can extract from Steward, the hospitals we want to extract, and they should be.

It's key to our entire existence. They should be profitable at the local level. That's why we do it at the local level. So for example, let's just take Utah because Stuart has already agreed to sell Utah. What if something bad happened at the Steward parent level 12 months ago, and we had to start taking back our facilities where we would capture those Utah assets and any others we wanted, presumably, they would be generating strong profitability based on the local coverage that we've just reported.

And we would be able to call HCA or Inter Mountain or some other large operator who wants to get into Utah and tell them, we're the landlord, we have these businesses, it's not just empty shell buildings, we have these businesses that are generating substantial profitability, recurring profitability, we'd like to give them to you.

You don't have to -- you don't have to pay to get into a market. You don't have to ramp up. You don't have to put in a whole lot of capital. All you have to do is take over these lease payments. But that's the whole concept behind us focusing on facility level, local level coverages. This essentially boils down to the idea that the REIT is not really tied to its tenants.

It owns properties, and as long as a property is profitable the property is valuable and the operator is fungible. That is roughly a 10X multiple on today's price. SNF's trade at low multiples because their revenues are in jeopardy. Omega Healthcare OHI is a big, well-run company, yet it has already lost some tenants and is slated to lose a couple more. There have been and will be more rent rolldowns in the SNF space.

The reason MPW has gotten so cheap is because a substantial portion of the market believed Steward was soon to default on leases. With that sort of risk on the table, it somewhat made sense to trade MPW at that multiple.

Further, I think the enhanced disclosure package will help the market see it this way. The days of pricing MPW at a multiple that indicates they are on the cusp of disaster are over. It could be the catalyst that brings it back to a more appropriate multiple in the mid teens. MPW is a fairly high leverage company, so its multiple is not going the be in the 20s with the broader REIT index, but its pace of FFO growth along with its long streak of dividend increases fundamentally justifies a multiple of around 14XX.

Over the past few years MPW has grown its asset base at a rapid pace. Acquisition volumes in the billions were a huge percent of existing assets.

Whenever a REIT grows that fast it does raise concerns that they are growing for the sake of growth. CEO's often like to build empires and this is particularly the case when they have been there since the beginning as Ed Aldag has with MPW.

I must admit that I too felt some concern about empire building here, but this quarter's commentary went a long way toward dispelling this fear. Management made it very clear that they have no intention of issuing equity when the stock is this cheap. This recycling is a responsible and shareholder friendly move. With MPW freshly transparent and its risk level reduced, I think significant multiple expansion is ahead.

Right now there are abnormally great investment opportunities. With the market crash, some fundamentally strong stocks have gotten outrageously cheap and I want to show you how to take advantage and slingshot out of the dip. Our portfolio is freshly update. Grab your free trial today while these stocks are still cheap! Through a selective process and consideration of market dynamics, we aim to construct portfolios for rising streams of dividend income and capital appreciation.

Our Portfolio Income Solutions Marketplace service provides stock picks, extensive analysis and data sheets to help enhance the returns of do-it-yourself investors. As a state registered investment advisor, 2MCAC is a fiduciary to our advisory clients. Full Disclosure. All content is published and provided as an information source for investors capable of making their own investment decisions.

None of the information offered should be construed to be advice or a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The information offered is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of the specific person.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it other than from Seeking Alpha. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: Important Notes and Disclosure All articles are published and provided as an information source for investors capable of making their own investment decisions. The information offered is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person. Readers should verify all claims and do their own due diligence before investing in any securities, including those mentioned in the article. NEVER make an investment decision based solely on the information provided in our articles.

It should not be assumed that any of the securities transactions or holdings discussed were profitable or will prove to be profitable. Past Performance does not guarantee future results. Investing in publicly held securities is speculative and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Historical returns should not be used as the primary basis for investment decisions.

Commentary may contain forward looking statements which are by definition uncertain. Actual results may differ materially from our forecasts or estimations, and 2MC and its affiliates cannot be held liable for the use of and reliance upon the opinions, estimates, forecasts, and findings in this article.

 

iPhone Everything we know about Apple's new phone line - CNET.Discover Capture One features

 

Stick with us on this journey, and we'll keep you involved every step of the way,' said Orta. For more information on Capture One, visit its website. Capture One 22 is available as a perpetual license or subscription. You can download a day free trial of the software by clicking here. Looking at the feature-list, the main differences seem to be: PTGui offers masking, which is handy e.

C1 outputs a raw image. I wonder, if session users would appreciate feature for a metadata "search engine". I want to search meta data across all my sessions just like if they were in one catalog.

I use C1 in conjunction with Mylio to do this and it works well. All tagging, keywords, facial recognition etc stored within XMP companion files and can be read LR as well. All my sessions are stored and managed within Mylio like a file browser and it's search capabilities allow you to find the file and you can right click and go to the session folder to do edits.

Very good idea. My storage happens to be a Linux server so I found shotwell as a nice workaround. I've always liked the C1 results, but it's just too expensive. I've learned to use other, cheaper, software competently to compensate. Lots of good stuff out there if you shop around and commit to learning that stuff.

The last two upgrades 21 and 22 where underwhelming at best. The new features are half-developed. At the same time there was a hike in prices.

Consumers will not tolerate this policy in the long run. C1 23 needs to be a substantial better upgrade or there will be an exodus towards adobe again. Agreed, i'm not upgrading this time and i'm on the fence if i'll stick around long term as they continue to ramp up pricing and charge extra for services that Adobe include. They're going to charge extra for the iPad app and already charge extra for their Live service. Such a shame that Capture One won't bring this software out on Android as well, given the massive dominance of Android in the mobile marketplace.

I have a large Galaxy Tab tablet with a gorgeous display and I'm certainly not buying an iPad just to run Capture One. The software is expensive enough as it is. So good to see the effort and I'm sure it will work great on iPad, but it's wasted on me and most of the market, unfortunately.

I can totally understand that move. Apple customers are are one to two magnitudes more willing to pay for something. And developing for Android is much more challenging because of the many models and Os versions. It is a quality engineers nightmare. That means Capture One doesn't have to expect huge sales to justify investing in this port. Porting to Android would require a bigger commitment.

Photoshop for Android by Adobe is available on the Play store. As is Lightroom mobile. And On1 Photo Raw. I also would like to challenge the statement saying that Apple customers are 10x to x more willing to pay for something. That to me frankly sounds like something you pulled out of thin air. I'm an Android user and I'm just as likely to pay for software on my tablet or phone as the next guy is. There was a time when developing software for Android was a bit harder because of the greater variation in hardware platforms.

But franky those days are long gone, which is why a lot of other companies do not have to pretend Andoid users don't exist or are somehow not worthy of consideration. Michael Berg Look more carefully. The only kind of Photoshop available for Android is Photoshop Express, which is a completely different beast in all but name.

I think it's less to do about the size of the Mobile market or even the tablet market but the size of the high end powerful tablet market.

Android has a huge share of phones, but this really is made more for a tablet experience than a phone experience, and iPad has a better coverage and this is partly a response to them already supporting the next biggest competition in terms of tablets Windows Surface tablets, which they were supporting already.

As others mentioned, it's much easier to port a Mac app to iPad than it is to port Windows to Android, and the wide range of Android devices with a wider range of specs makes it even more complicated to support. Considering the iPad edition wasn't until apple announced M1 processor powered iPad Pros that C1 announced they were developing for it, I wouldn't be surprised if they said minimum support for iPad is something with an M1 chip.

I really doubt this could run on a Fire tablet. If you really want to run everything on device, you really should be looking into browser based solutions. This is possible with modern browsers that offer a virtual machine with full access to the underlying hardware. Witness photopea, onshape, sketchup and even Lightroom as examples of how to do things right. Developing beefy, native clients are really a thing of the past IMO.

The browser should be the only required component on the target device. Oh well. Maybe you're all right and I'm wrong. I just think that as one of the leading providers of professional solutions in this segment, a company like Capture One would be able to come up with something more original and ambitious than "you have to own a very specific model of an iPad".

That's just yet another platform to maintain. Browser based solutions utilizing cloud VMs require a solid internet connection, which is not always possible on shoots. LR's tablet App is not quite a browser solution and RAW processing has some particular complexities which Photopea, Onshape, and Sketchup do not handle.

When wanting to use a mobile device it may be outside a controlled studio where wifi or cell coverage might not be a guarantee. C1's market has a higher percentage of professionals compared to other programs though recently they have been making some choices that may draw a wider audience so choices they make are often geared towards what is used on a professional set or shoot.

They expect to see high end Surface Tablets with intel processors and iPad Pros more than they expect to see Amazon Fire tablets. The entire point is that the software runs locally in the virtual machine that the browser provides. There is no requirement to be online see Photopea for example. As for the size of the files from PhaseOne cameras this is a problem that isn't solved by running a local app.

Photopea provided the bare minimum of adjustments for RAW files. This is a lot more computationally intensive. All processing is to be done locally, so IO is not an issue. Demosaicing, gamma adjustments, color conversion, noise reduction, sharpening, plus a multitude of adjustments with a range of complexity both globally and locally over MP is a lot of processing.

Photopea is just an example of how complex, resource-demanding applications can in fact run in the browser. There are no "inherent" problems with performance or storage to overcome, and the features you mention are not missing due to lack of capability in the runtime. Browsers today offer incredibly powerful, sandboxed runtime environments that are able to achieve the same level of performance as native apps. Loading a mp file is no easier or harder here than doing the same thing in Swift.

I'm sure Capture One has their reasons for going iOS only, but the strategy they have chosen excludes a huge chunk of the market and gives them yet another platform to service and maintain. That cost is passed on to you. It is true browsers do not have the same level hardware control for graphics, such as webGL support is pretty common, but openCL which is more needed for actual computation as photos aren't drawing cubes in space is kind of dying and CUDA and Metal are not available in the browser.

A running complex computations in Swift will be faster than those written for a browser. And with Apple specifically you have a standard level of hardware. A VM browser still needs to translate the code to run on your hardware and a Fire tablet is not going to be thee same experience as your Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra.

There will be cases where you are limited by power or RAM. Photopea is not a raw processor so it doesn't have complex features that support a raw workflow. There is no technical reason why it couldn't though - if it wanted to be a raw processor, that is. You can get perfectly reasonable performance out of any recent Samsung tablet for running these kinds of apps.

Well Javascript compiles to the exact same bytecode as Swift so I'll have to disagree with you on that one. Maybe you have access to some benchmarks that I don't. Yes Photopea is not a full raw processor, but you have yet to point to anything that is a browser based full web processor. Maybe in 5 years but not today. Are you trying to argue a false equivalency or do actually think runtime compiling that JavaScript does has no impact on performance? You can write a program that takes several minutes to hours to compile in Swift or Objective C, you cannot do that in JavaScript and have an enjoyable experience.

Keep posting inaccuracies and I will counter. OK so this mag is "free". But it has in the past kept an editorial line that was more or less independent of suppliers. No longer it seems. Why didn't DPR contact a few users of C1 to get a perspective on this gush? DPR is slipping, I'm afraid.

Pretty soon -- if not already -- the best parts of the mag. DPR has always reported press releases as news. I like that it is separately priced. I dont have an ipad and dont plan on it. Nor do i care for live. But having more options for people who have needs is a good thing.

I do have capture 22, grant i still prefer to edit in lightroom 6 with dng conversion. You'll be waiting forever. First, CaptureOne will not support a direct corporate rival. Especially given Hasselblad's past attitude towards PhaseOne backs. Second, Hasselblad will not share their "colour science" with PhaseOne, given that it is one of the very few USPs they still have - even if it is probably just smoke and mirrors.

And anyway, how many extra customers would CaptureOne acquire from such an investment? I can't see that it would add much if any profit. Why not use Lr or Photoshop?

So they're not letting in Hasselblad through any back doors. No way. For now, yes. I can't imagine that this would be that difficult to compile an ARM64 version in addition to x I'm not renewing my subscription, it's getting too greedy like Adobe. Sucks because they were the best alternative. Prepare to pay up This company wants more, more, more since they were acquired by an investment company. Time for Nikon to develop an enthusiast compact camera and an NX Studio app then.

So that I can just use those. They've focused on the Apple user market for a reason. People in that space are used to paying more. Apple offers frameworks to help but its adopting those and the tweaking that gets you. They should be focusing to getting the bug ridden v22 resolved before this scant requirement. Support don't respond when you raise a ticket and you can't contact them directly, its very poor service.

I received an "inquiry" about my ticket from last moth a day or so ago. If that is really the case, then hiding from being shelled is just a bit more important than answering wimpy users.

I do not own any Apple products, so I don't really care about this sub product. The other target group is on exactly the opposite end of the spectrum: hobbyists who want something convenient. A company with limited resources is going to follow the money. I have had several "tickets" open with CO about issues that are unique to Windows.

The response has been poor with many tickets basically stating, "it is your system that is the problem - the ticket is being closed". The current emphasis is on Apple products, with Windows systems being essentially ignored. CO's eyes are not on Windows - it is all Apple.

I doubt that CO even has developer devices that are up to date. I have had them say they will not investigate an issue because I was using a more current version of Windows 10 them they claimed they had in house. This was three months after the feature release OS upgrade was available from Microsquish. I'd get an iPad if C1 works well with that and an iPhone. Just hope it integrates well with with cloud between devices and all.

Guess it's time to start seeing what wifi hard drives work well in the meantime. Weird considering in this very news post it states "Capture One will also bring its software to iPhone in , adding another element of versatility to the ecosystem. Their website also states "Capture One for iPhone Adding to your choice of devices for a smooth on the go workflow, bringing Capture One to iPhone will add another element to the full circle of flexibility and freedom across platforms.

What many Apple distractors don't get is how seamlessly their desktops, tablets and phones interact. As an apple user, I wish it were really that easy.

If you keep all your photos in the Photos app and spend a mint on an iCloud plan, then it is almost seamless. If you use other apps, you are at the mercy of their cloud compatibility and sync, which means you are back at same problem you'd have running another OS. Sure, but once you involve third party software, it's not apple ecosystem. I can sync files between literally any platform using the right software and services.

It still helps if all your devices run the same apps with the same interface. Otherwise you are right, you may as well link iOS and PCs. I find value in my 2TB of iCloud storage precisely because it makes my workflows, photo and otherwise, plus my device backups simple, reliable and seamless. I was wondering how this system will share pictures for collaboration. I kind of like that the RAW negatives are stored on the main desktop and only smart previews are shared across the cloud.

Collab across platforms is awesome, but the actual implementation matters. I hope Capture One gets a good system. Well Apple is only easy and seamless if you use their applications and services in the very strict and limited way Apple is allowing you to do. There is zero flexibility in that system, I am using Apple for 30 years and in the beginning they got the syncing really good but then changed it and I tried so often to integrate it in my workflow but it always ended up being a productivity killer.

So it can be great if you like it exactly the way Apple implemented it or it's worthless. In addition to my Photo Library which I access with any number of third party processing applications my entire documents folder is seamlessly syncronized via iCloud. Hated that. But now, with iTunes gone, it's easy. Can use iCloud, or if the devices are on the same network an app called iMaze. Sure there are other solutions. On the other hand, if it works well for you in the PC world, then there is no need to change.

Never break what works :. That is partly well implemented partly it's made hard on purpose. You need to be moderate in IT to set it up but then it works flawless. So I like that part on Apple a lot. They also offer an Windows Application that can do limited iCloud syncing although it's bad. Credits to them for even offering it. Well let me tell you: both macOS and Windows are weird systems. I love macOS for it's workflow integration, this is really bad on Windows.

And I love Windows for how it maintains compatibility, for it's professional features, how it's possible to troubleshoot so much that just wouldn't work on macOS at all and the powerful hardware I get. Well, you are much deeper into IT than I am. Probably my computing needs are also much lower than yours. I simply want things that work without having to tinker. It would be better news if they got off their butts and made C1, 22 perform as good as their prerelease marketing.

Though this Linux user is happy with the open source options available and does not need another accelerating repeated cost. But if ridiculing a free platform is being upvoted I'm probably in the wrong thread. Seeya payers. I actually would, but one of my Eizo monitors is too old, so that Colournavigatior 7 does not support it. Finally it runs under linux, but not me :. The issue with Linux.. You can not really port it to Linux, it's too messy.

The problem is that there are not many Linux users, and most Linux users do not pay for software. There have been publishers who gambled on linux and all say the same thing. Hard to want to dedicate a team to Linux, when the total sales won't even cover the salary of one developer for a year. Honestly it might take MORE work than mac or PC because there are so many distros to cover and near infinite build options for linux.

It is highly unlikely that with current Linux adoption that they would develop for the Linux platform. Linux is a niche, and photographers that want to use Linux is a niche of a niche. There needs to be more users to make developing Capture One make any financial sense to Phase One.

I use at least six paid software on Linux. Usually Linux users are more generous in paying. There are more articles if you research. The idea that Linux users don't pay comes from Linux being free. For majority of the Linux users, "free" is not the forerunner in choosing Linux. I have all three Mac, windows and Linux and Linux is my daily driver. Starting from my hardware, everything is premium.

Experience shows that commercial software for Linux is almost always a flop with very little sales. The ones who do are making good money. Most of the Linux guys started their journey with open source apps and as we all know, it is hard to break a habit even if it is less than ideal. Linux market share on desktops and laptops itself is highly debatable since there is no official count anywhere.

It is a chicken and egg problem companies won't make it until there are enough users, and users won't come until there is enough software for now.

However, developers are slowly migrating to Linux for its ease of use for software development except the apple ecosystem such as iOS. That leaves the creatives, something no one can say for sure until one of these companies takes a bold step.

I am using Linux and I am using windows for stuff that will not run on Linux. I have bough Capture One and would be happy if it would run on Linux and I would not be forced to swap to windows for that purpose.

But as I sayd, one of my monitors is too old to run on Linux. And also my sound card Maya44 lacks some funktions in linux. I think wo should stop calling it Linux and name its flavors. That would make the diversity and complexity more transparent. That said ist is an awesome OS overall. That already happens to an extent, such as Ubuntu which, while free, has a company behind it with paid support if needed. Well, C1 costs as much as you choose. Especially given their SLOW release of lens profiles.

Missing like half the RF lenses. Only 5 profiles for Nikon Z. No profiles for Panasonic FF lenses. With modern lenses, profiles are no longer optional in most cases. So if there is no lens profile, the software is effectively useless. Not sure why it is so hard to get profiles made.

So subscription-only, just like Adobe. Wasn't it Capture One that had an option to import externally created lens profiles? Or was that Lightroom? I don't know because I haven't had that problem since Adobe went to a subscription model. RF is a bit of a special case compared to the other mirrorless mounts because it seems no one has any access to the profiles besides Canon And they might not even be embedded in RAW files like with most other formats, so they definitely need to create them from scratch.

On other MILC mounts Adobe uses some or all of the existing profiles but still ties them program updates which is somewhat annoying IMO, they could push those out much faster Adobe and Capture One are literally the only development programs that have some semblance of a relationship with lens makers like that and some direct access to profiles etc btw. Every other program out there uses a 3rd party open source lens correction database AFAIK except for DxO which makes their own from scratch too.

I think Adobe uses vignetting and CA info from the E mount profiles but then creates their own for geometric corrections but Adobe isn't very transparent about any of it, I like the way C1 handles it better but YMMV depending on system, needs, etc. If that means you have to set up your own lab to make them, then it is a cost of doing business. I'm not sure whether Adobe or C1 is more timely with their in house profiles, probably comes down to brand, Adobe definitely has broader support The whole backroom dealing situation between either and the camera manufacturers is annoying, why doesn't anyone else get to do so?

Capture One for me overplayed their cards with the terrible introduction of the HDR and Panorama options. Seldom I have seen such poor execution of features in a software package aimed towards professional photographers. Both the HDR and Panorama features are mere useless in the current implementation.

I still have to fall back to photoshop to execute these tasks. Add the price hike they forced upon us and I am starting to linger back to Lightroom and Photoshop. Capture One better make sure these new features will work flawless or they will be facing a big loss in confidence from a large part of their user base. I took panorama and HDR as previews of what C1 is working right now.

I have not used HDR but it is obvious that panorama needs to improved immediately in the next 22 update. I feel I payed for that when upgrading from 21 to 22! Personally I do not see much point in mobile device support unless everything is connected together with a cloud.

In fact, at he point of purchasing 22 I was very close to jump back to Adobe I still have the license! C1 is superior to Lr as a raw converter and in photo editing but I think they should develop the ecosystem more cloud based.

Have you updated to the latest version when it came out, it was slow and there were lots of misstitches, after the update, it works very good This is a shame since distortion correction must be applied manually. I find the problems with X adapters strange since historically C1 has reputation of being the best raw converter for Fuji x-trans files, and it also has Fuji film simulations.

No wonder C1 has attracted Fuji users. I have complained about this repeatedly to C1. In my testing, the panorama stitch is actually very good. C1 was able to stitch a highly complex set of images that Affinity was unable.

C1 is a small company and they lack the bandwidth to both develop new products and clean-up the mess with C1, I suspect that it will be a long time before we see any major improvements in C1, If C1,22 does not get serious and deliver their pre-release advertised performance, I doubt that I will never buy another C1 pre-release package again.

They got me on 22, but they will not get me on 23! Exactly - If Capture One can't get their products to work as advertised in the first place then its pretty ridiculous and pretentious to release an iPad version of their software. Who is going to buy software of which by now is known NOT to work as they promised. We can see that apple does the same with their various OS updates. Although the iPad doesn't have a file managing system like Finder or like on Windows.

For me, tethering is a must for the iPad, but for long jobs, charging and tethering with one hub on the iPad would not be possible. The Surface Pro 8 would be better, which is basically a miniature desk top with a similar weight and portability to an iPad.

But for the masses an iPad maybe more common and most may not use tethering, so could be a good option. Actually there is a file management system on iOS in which you can place, load, copy, open, duplicate, share and move files of any kind and within and from folders.

It is easy to access and your are able to exchange files to and from your NAS and cloud platforms. I can also seamlessly exchange files to and from my Mac with any iOS product. Looks to me you never used any Apple iOS product for years already and have been stuck in your own believes. Hi Francis - thanks for correcting me. Your first paragraph is fine and helpful.

As for your well worded gentlemanly "Looks to me you never used any Apple iOS product for years already and have been stuck in your own believes".

There was no reason to write that tone. I still don't know why people do that, given there was no animosities to anyone. With those two the society would be in much better place. Seems like I have succeeded. Such a devilish move, right? Eh, iOS does have a file manager but, it's so cumbersome to use. You have no status bar on how far something has progressed on transferring, and if the iPad goes to sleep, you have to start all over again.

They raise the price and offer nothing new for working pro photographers. I will never be editing a customers job on a Ipad. I am look at other programs at this point to move to.

Not being held hostage with the new price plan they started. Do the iPad versions e. Lightroom work out of the cloud, or do you need to load the actual image files to the iPad? Wondering how C1P will handle this. When I'm away from home I use my iPad to offload photos from my Sony camera to it, then Lightroom takes them and uploads them to Adobe cloud.

But when I open the app I can use any image in my cloud storage. I'd like to see C1 offer integration with real cloud storage AWS, Azure, etc as well as pre-configured or consumer cloud options. The biggest limiter on the Adobe side for me with LR is being tied to Adobe's cloud solution. It will be local files only when it launches. Online cloud sync is on the roadmap.

But it won't come before Capture One 23 since the sync wouldn't work with the current version. They've been milking it for some time. A lot of features maps, face recognition were implemented half-baked, and have never really progressed, presumably because no one uses half-baked features. The only real progress in my recent memory is the new masking tools. They have some catching up to do. My bad, I must have missed it.

Thanks for pointing that out. Still, good to have options rather than complain about them. I have LR on my Samsung tablet. These days, a huge phablet size phone isn't so different in size or function from an actual tablet. There are different versions for phone and tablet. For a while only certain features were available for each. If you're not making use of the ability to edit an manipulate your photo catalog remotely the joke's on you LOL give me a break, anyone claims they are needing serious editing tools on a phone is full of it.

I use it all the time as do most colleagues. I can rate, cull export and edit when I have a few minutes downtime. Then I can export or share them. Skin Tone Editing. Black and White tool. Layers and Masks Focus your edits on specific parts of your image — without affecting the rest.

Apply up to 16 layers and create precise masks to separate areas for editing. Layers and Masks. Linear Gradient. Luminosity Masking. Feather Mask and Refine Mask. Grey Scale Mask. Radial Masks. Magic brush. Merge and Stitch Our new multi-imaging tools put even more creative freedom in your hands. Merge and Stitch. Organization From individual images to thousands of shots, stay on top of projects and files with smart management tools. Plus, get advanced settings to export different file types faster.

Enhanced Importer. Catalogs and Sessions. Keywords and Keyword Lists. Export recipes. Sorting and culling tools. Filters and Smart Albums. Workflow and performance Get a seamless photo editing process thanks to a personalized interface and fast performance. Workflow and performance. Wireless tethering. Tethered Capture. Customizable workspace. Keyboard Shortcuts. Copy Adjustments. PSD round-trip support.